Manuscript readings for KD.2.167

L.2.169KD.2.167 ¶ Tho haued notaries none · annoyed þei were
               
M.2.169KD.2.167Tho h....ad þeM.2.169: M uniquely reads þe at this point, though the reading is shared with two A manuscripts. notaries none . annoyede thei were . 
               
Cr1.2.169KD.2.167  Tho had Notaries none anoied they were
W.2.169KD.2.167    ¶  Tho hadde Notaries none . anoyed þei were
               
Hm.2.167KD.2.167  ¶ tho hadden notaryes none  a-noyȝed thei were · 
               
C.2.169KD.2.167  ¶ Tho had notaries non · anoyed they were
               
G.3.169KD.2.167  tho had notaryes non / anoyyd therewyth
O.2.168KD.2.167Þoo hadden notaries noon  anoyed þei werenO.2.168: The letter <d> is rewritten above the line, apparently because the <d> in anoyed is spoiled by an inkblot.
R.2.128KD.2.167
                  						¶ Þo hauedR.2.128: Only manuscript L agrees with R's unusual verb form haued (common in the thirteenth century but nowhere cited in
                        								MED, s. v.
                        							haven, later than about 1330, except for Piers Plowman).
                        							Both F and the majority of beta copies read had(de). The same line appears
                        							in A, but Kane was not concerned to record such morphemic variations,
                        							regarding them all as accidentals. notaries none  anuyed þei were .
               
F.3.168KD.2.167/ [¶] Þan Notarijs hadde noone / & a-noyed þey wheryn.
               
Readings for line KD.2.167
